It was his first big chance to differentiate himself from Mike Bloomberg, and Bill de Blasio blew it.
Last week, Mayor de Blasio had
a chance to show voters that he was, despite his new Upper East
Side digs, the same man they voted for. He could have, in one statement, restored
our sense that he was, despite his vague and malleable positions on many
crucial issues, one of us.
Instead he ran
from the conflict.
If you follow the taboids and TV, you know the story: late one night early in the week, Mayor de Blasio picked up the phone to call police officials to find out what was going on with
Bishop Orlando Findlayter, a key campaign supporter, who had been pulled over
in his car for making a turn without signaling. Then, when records showed
several open warrants (apparently for symbolic arrests at protest
demonstrations), the clergyman was hauled off to his local precinct. Since he
was arrested at almost midnight, he was probably destined to spend the night
and the following day, and perhaps even the following evening, at central
booking going through the cumbersome and nasty arrest-to-arraignment process.
When the press
queried the Mayor about the ethics of pushing for special treatment for a
crony, de Blasio defended his phone call by terming Findlayter’s case “unusual.” Then he clammed up, cancelling a press appearance and vanishing from the public
eye. He might as well have flown to Bermuda.
Sadly, though,
in that one word the Mayor did say about the issue, he misspoke. What happened
to Bishop Findlayter was many things—but it was not unusual. Arrests for things
that don’t merit arrest happen all the time in New York City. The only two
unusual things here are that it happened to an FoB—a friend of Bill—and that it’s
being talked about in the press.
Sure it was
boneheaded for the Mayor to phone the police and even appear to interfere on
behalf of a friend and supporter. But let’s be honest: during the Bloomberg years, it became alarmingly
common for New Yorkers to be given tickets, and even to be arrested, for amazingly
petty things. Think veering out of a bike lane to avoid a truck that was illegally
double-parked. Think walking your dog in a park after dark. Think being accosted
by the cops (stop & frisk, anyone?) and not having an ID with you. Think
minor automotive things like the Bishop’s supposed infraction (in some circles,
that’s called DWB, driving while black.)
This is exactly
the tale of two cities that Mayor de Blasio decried in his campaign—that
well-connected people like the Bishop get to walk from the precinct, while
everyone else is being processed and prosecuted and treated as if they were a
violent criminal in punishment for stupid petty violations.
Sorry, Mr.
Mayor: if it’s wrong for the bishop, it’s wrong for everyone, and you ought to
say so. Arresting people on silly charges like this is a waste of police time, a
waste of court time, a waste of the people’s time. And it does nothing to
prevent crime. Indeed, it stigmatizes a whole generation—because a kid who finds
himself in this situation (you can relate: think of your son, Dante, who
featured so mightily in your campaign) might find that that arrest follows him
in his computerized records for the rest of his life, potentially blocking him
from getting an education or a job.
The Mayor had a
chance to be our true elected representative. He had a chance to speak truth to
power. He had a chance to say something meaningful: that he had strong reservations
about a criminal justice system that would, even temporarily, incarcerate a person—anyone, not just a Bishop and campaign supporter—for spurious and
ridiculous violations like making a turn without signaling and getting arrested
at demonstrations for engaging in acts of free speech.
And the Mayor ran
away.
1 comment:
Apologies to anyone who caught my initial embarrassing misspelling.
Post a Comment